The efficacy and safety of anamorelin among patients with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Anamorelin is a selective ghrelin receptor agonist approved for cancer cachexia in Japan. Little is known about predictors of anamorelin efficacy. This study aimed to assess the effect of diabetes on the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with cancer cachexia. METHODS: Medical records of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung, gastric, pancreatic, or colorectal cancer who received anamorelin between January 2021 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The diabetic (DM) group included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, random plasma glucose of ≥ 200 mg/dL, or hemoglobin A1c of ≥ 6.5%. The maximum body weight gain and adverse events during anamorelin administration were compared between the DM and non-DM groups. Patients with a maximum body weight gain ≥ 0 kg were classified as the responders. RESULTS: Of 103 eligible patients, 31 (30.1%) were assigned to the DM group. The DM group gained less weight (median of -0.53% vs. + 3.00%, p < 0.01) and had fewer responders (45.2% vs. 81.9%, p < 0.01) than the non-DM group. The odds ratio for non-response in the DM group was 6.55 (95% confidential interval 2.37-18.06, p < 0.01), adjusted by age and performance status. The DM group had a higher cumulative incidence of hyperglycaemic adverse events (72.2% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.01) and more discontinuations due to hyperglycaemic adverse events (25.8% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.01) than the non-DM group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes and cancer cachexia are less likely to gain weight with anamorelin despite a high risk of hyperglycaemic adverse events.

Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary LCNEC. We retrospectively reviewed patients with pulmonary LCNEC or possible LCNEC (pLCNEC) who received platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Among these patients, we evaluated the efficacy of second-line treatment by comparing patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC group). Of the 61 patients with LCNEC or pLCNEC (LCNEC group) who received first-line chemotherapy, 39 patients were treated with second-line chemotherapy. Among the 39 patients, 61.5% received amrubicin monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the LCNEC groups were 3.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. No significant differences in the PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.924, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.647-1.320; P = 0.664) and OS (HR: 0.926; 95% CI 0.648-1.321; P = 0.670) were observed between the LCNEC and SCLC groups. In patients treated with amrubicin, the PFS (P = 0.964) and OS (P = 0.544) were not different between both the groups. Second-line chemotherapy, including amrubicin, may be considered as a treatment option for patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

Nursing students' self-assessed level of nursing skills at the time of graduation in a Japanese University: A retrospective observational study.

Objective: This study aimed to clarify nursing students' self-assessed levels of nursing skills at a nursing university at graduation and discuss how education and clinical experiences for students and post-licensure nurses should be improved, especially focusing on oncology nursing. Methods: The study population comprised fourth-year students from 2017 to 2019 at the Faculty of Health Science and Nursing, Juntendo University, who had completed all stipulated clinical placements. The Japanese government determined 141 nursing skills and their target levels. Students subjectively evaluated their achieved levels for the 141 nursing skills after the final clinical placement. Results: Of the 141 nursing skills, 81 (57%) were rated as "skills with easy-to-achieve targets" and five were rated as "skills with difficult-to-achieve targets." All nursing skills in the two subcategories of environmental adjustment skills and comfort management skills were rated as "skills with easy-to-achieve targets." Nursing skills with low target achievement rates were for patients with oral intake difficulties, unstable respiratory status, and those requiring glycemic control. These skills are also important in oncology nursing. Conclusions: It cannot be concluded that the nursing university students fully achieved the target levels of nursing skills, as determined by the Japanese government. These findings may facilitate discussions on teaching nursing skills and their target levels at the time of graduation from nursing universities or post-employment.

Concordance of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement between immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Although various companion diagnostic tests of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement are approved, few reports have assessed the concordance of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement in two companion diagnostic tests: next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing and immunohistochemistry (IHC). METHODS: The samples evaluated for gene alterations using NGS testing between May 2019 and November 2021 were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: samples were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer; the results of the NGS analysis were informative; and samples had residual specimens for IHC. We performed IHC on the residual specimens and retrospectively collected sample characteristics from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 185 samples were analyzed using NGS. Twenty-six samples were excluded because of failure to analyze gene alterations using NGS, no residual samples, and inadequate IHC. We analyzed 159 samples. The major histological type was adenocarcinoma (115 samples). The number of surgical and transbronchial lung biopsy specimens was 59 and 56, respectively. ALK fusion gene-rearrangement was detected in four samples using NGS, and five were detected using IHC. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC referred to by NGS were 75.0% and 98.7%, respectively. The concordance rate between IHC and NGS was 98.1%. ALK rearrangement was detected in two patients using IHC but not using NGS. In addition, ALK rearrangement was detected in one patient using NGS but not using IHC. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that IHC and NGS might be complementary tests. In patients suspected of harboring ALK fusion gene-rearrangement, it should be analyzed using another diagnostic method.

Relationship between patterns of immunohistochemical conventional neuroendocrine markers and efficacy of immune check point inhibitors in patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Which patients benefit from the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. There have been few reports on the efficacy of ICIs based on conventional immunohistochemical neuroendocrine (NE) markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and neural cell adhesion molecule [NCAM]). In the present study, we aimed to analyze the relationship between the expression of immunohistochemical NE markers and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with extensive disease (ED)-SCLC, to assess whether conventional NE markers are predictive of ICIs. METHODS: Patients with untreated ED-SCLC who received first-line therapy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between November 2002 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy according to the expression status of each immunohistochemical NE marker in patients treated with ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemo group) and with chemotherapy alone (chemo group). RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were included in the ICI-chemo and chemo groups, respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) tended to be better in patients in the ICI-chemo group than those treated with chemotherapy alone in patients with NE marker-positive SCLC. In particular, it was statistically significant in patients with chromogranin A-positive SCLC (p = 0.036). In patients with NE marker-negative SCLC, no significant differences were observed in PFS between the two groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), regardless of the expression of any conventional NE marker. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the efficacy of ICIs in addition to chemotherapy may be poor in patients with NE marker-negative SCLC.

The barriers to interprofessional care for cancer cachexia among Japanese healthcare providers: A nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia is a severe complication of advanced malignancy, with few therapeutic options. To promote interprofessional care for cancer cachexia, healthcare providers' needs should be addressed in detail. This pre-planned subgroup analysis of the Global Educational Needs Evaluation: a systemic interprofessional study in cancer cachexia (GENESIS-CC) survey aimed to identify barriers to interprofessional care of cancer cachexia in Japan. METHODS: A nationwide survey was electronically conducted for healthcare providers in oncological or general healthcare facilities from January to March 2021 in Japan. The Japanese Regional Advisory Board developed a barrier scoring system with 33 from the 58 original survey items to quantify six domains of barriers: (1) lack of confidence, (2) lack of knowledge, (3) barriers in personal practice, (4) barriers in perception, (5) barriers in team practice and (6) barriers in education. The largest possible barrier score was set at 100 points. We compared the scores by profession. RESULTS: A total of 1227 valid responses were obtained from 302 (24.6%) physicians, 252 (20.5%) pharmacists, 236 (19.2%) nurses, 218 (17.8%) dietitians, 193 (15.7%) rehabilitation therapists and 26 (2.0%) other professionals. Overall, 460 (37.5%) were not very or at all confident about cancer cachexia care, 791 (84.1%) agreed or strongly agreed that care was influenced by reimbursement availability and 774 (81.9%) did not have cancer cachexia as a mandatory curriculum. The largest mean barrier score (± standard deviation) was 63.7 ± 31.3 for education, followed by 55.6 ± 21.8 for team practice, 43.7 ± 32.5 for knowledge, 42.8 ± 17.7 for perception and 36.5 ± 16.7 for personal practice. There were statistically significant interprofessional differences in all domains (P < 0.05), especially for pharmacists and nurses with the highest or second highest scores in most domains. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to improve the educational system and team practices of cancer cachexia for most Japanese healthcare providers, especially pharmacists and nurses. Our study suggests the need to reform the mandatory educational curriculum and reimbursement system on cancer cachexia to promote interprofessional care for cancer cachexia in Japan.

Safety and efficacy of amrubicin with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim as second-line chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Amrubicin (AMR) regimens have shown efficacy as second-line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, adverse events such as febrile neutropenia (FN) sometimes preclude their use. Further, the safety and efficacy of AMR with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim (P-PEG) have not been sufficiently evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of AMR with or without P-PEG as second-line chemotherapy for SCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with SCLC who received AMR as second-line chemotherapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center, between December 2014 and November 2021. Based on presence/absence of P-PEG in their regimen, patients (n = 60) were divided into P-PEG (n = 21) and non-P-PEG groups, and their clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Median of AMR treatment cycles was five (range: 1-39 cycles) in P-PEG group and four (range: 1-15 cycles) in non-P-PEG group. The incidence of FN (4.8% vs. 30.8%; p = 0.02) and AMR dose reduction because of adverse events (4.8% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.08) were lower in the P-PEG group than in the non-P-PEG group. The objective response rates were 52.4% and 30.8%, and median progression-free and overall survival were 4.7 and 3.0 months, and 9.6 and 6.8 months, in the P-PEG and non-P-PEG groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AMR with P-PEG as second-line chemotherapy for SCLC reduced the incidence of FN at a maintained AMR dose intensity and was associated with favorable tumor responses and survival outcomes. P-PEG should be considered for patients treated with AMR for SCLC including refractory relapsed SCLC.

Diagnosis and outcomes of cachexia in Asia: Working Consensus Report from the Asian Working Group for Cachexia.

Chronic diseases often lead to metabolic disorders, causing anabolic resistance and increased energy consumption, which result in cachexia. Cachexia, in turn, can lead to major clinical consequences such as impaired quality of life, shortened life expectancy, and increased healthcare expenditure. Existing international diagnostic criteria for cachexia employ thresholds derived from Western populations, which may not apply to Asians due to differing body compositions. To address this issue, the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) was initiated. The AWGC comprises experts in cachexia research and clinical practice from various Asian countries and aims to develop a consensus on diagnostic criteria and significant clinical outcomes for cachexia in Asia. The AWGC, composed of experts in cachexia research and clinical practice from several Asian countries, undertook three-round Delphi surveys and five meetings to reach a consensus. Discussions were held on etiological diseases, essential diagnostic items for cachexia, including subjective and objective symptoms and biomarkers, and significant clinical outcomes. The consensus highlighted the importance of multiple diagnostic factors for cachexia, including chronic diseases, either or both weight loss or low body mass index, and at least one of the following: anorexia, decreased grip strength (<28 kg in men and <18 kg in women), or elevated C-reactive protein levels (>5 mg/L [0.5 mg/dL]). The AWGC proposed a significant weight change of 2% or more over a 3-6 month period and suggested a tentative cut-off value of 21 kg/m2 for low body mass index in diagnosing cachexia. Critical clinical outcomes were determined to be mortality, quality of life as assessed by tools such as EQ-5D or the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy, and functional status as measured by the Clinical Frailty Scale or Barthel Index, with significant emphasis on patient-reported outcomes. The AWGC consensus offers a comprehensive definition and user-friendly diagnostic criteria for cachexia, tailored specifically for Asian populations. This consensus is set to stimulate future research and enhance the multidisciplinary approach to managing cachexia. With plans to develop further guidelines for the optimal treatment, prevention, and care of cachexia in Asians, the AWGC criteria are expected to drive research across chronic co-morbidities and cancer in Asia, leading to future refinement of diagnostic criteria.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: 5-year outcomes in Japanese patients from CheckMate 227 Part 1.

BACKGROUND: In CheckMate 227 Part 1 (NCT02477826), first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated long-term durable overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. We report results in Japanese patients with ≥ 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC without EGFR/ALK aberrations were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy (patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1%), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy (patients with tumor PD-L1 < 1%). Five-year efficacy and safety were assessed in Japanese patients. RESULTS: At 62.1 months' minimum follow-up, 143 Japanese patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% or < 1% were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 66) or chemotherapy (n = 77). Five-year OS rates were 46% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 34% with chemotherapy (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 36% versus 19% (PD-L1 < 1%). Median duration of response was 59.1 versus 7.1 months (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 17.3 versus 3.0 months (PD-L1 < 1%). Among 5-year survivors treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (PD-L1 ≥ 1% and < 1%; n = 27), 59% (95% CI, 39%-75%) were off treatment for ≥ 3 years without receiving subsequent therapy. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: At 5-year follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to show long-term durable clinical benefit versus chemotherapy, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. Consistent with findings for the global population, these data support the use of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with metastatic NSCLC.

Continuous vs. Fixed 2-year Duration Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Database Analysis.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: The proper duration of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Previously, sponsor-initiated clinical trials have more often used either a maximum 2-year fixed duration of ICI treatment or continuous treatment until documented disease progression. The study aimed to evaluate the association between ICI treatment duration (2-year fixed or continuous) and prognosis in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 425 patients with NSCLC who received ICI before August 31, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: No differences in time to treatment failure > 24 months (TTF-24) were detected between patients who underwent ICI treatment for > 2 years and patients who stopped ICI treatment at 2 years. Treatment-related adverse events tended to be higher in the patients with ICI treatment > 2 years. CONCLUSION: ICI treatment > 2 years did not significantly prolong the TTF compared with ICI treatment = 2 years, but it did increase the incidence of treatment-related adverse events.

Immunohistochemical analysis of B7-H3 expression in patients with lung cancer following various anti-cancer treatments.

B7 homolog 3 protein (B7-H3), an immune checkpoint molecule belonging to the B7 family, has been studied as a target for the development of anti-cancer treatment; however, changes in B7-H3 expression during the clinical course remain unknown. This retrospective study aimed to investigate changes in B7-H3 expression of lung cancer specimens in patients with advanced lung cancer following various anti-cancer treatments. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) score was evaluated on a 0-3 scale, and B7-H3 expression was considered positive for grade ≥ 2. The difference in IHC scores before and after anti-cancer treatment was defined as the change in B7-H3 expression. Among 160 patients with lung cancer who received anti-cancer treatment, 88 (55%) and 101 (63%) had B7-H3 expression before and after anti-cancer treatment, respectively. Before treatment, B7-H3 expression was significantly more common in squamous cell carcinoma specimens than in adenocarcinoma specimens (95% vs. 49%, P < 0.001). Of the 19 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 18 (95%) continued to have high (IHC score: 3) B7-H3 expression following treatment. In contrast, of the 130 patients with adenocarcinoma, 46 (35%) and 17 (13%) showed an increased and a decreased expression, respectively. Patients who received targeted therapy had a significant increase in B7-H3 expression compared with those who received chemotherapy alone (P = 0.015). Overall, squamous cell carcinoma specimens maintained high B7-H3 expression during the clinical course, whereas adenocarcinoma specimens showed changes in expression following anti-cancer treatments. Our results provide the basis for further studies on the development of anti-cancer treatments targeting B7-H3.

Validation of the initial brain metastasis velocity in non-small cell lung cancer at a single cancer center.

PURPOSE: The initial brain metastasis velocity (iBMV) was recently reported as a survival predictor after brain metastases (BM) in patients treated by stereotactic radiosurgery. In this study, we validated whether iBMV is a prognostic tool, regardless of treatment modality, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with metachronous BM. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 3,792 new lung cancer cases in which no BM was found on magnetic resonance (MR) screening between February 2014 and December 2019, and enrolled 176 NSCLC patients with subsequent BM. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of MR to identify the time from BM to death. RESULTS: The median iBMV score was 1.9. We used an iBMV score of 2.0 as the cutoff level, as previously reported. An iBMV score ≥ 2.0 was significantly associated with older age, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and Stage IV (P = 0.04, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively). The median OS was 0.92 years. The median OS for patients with iBMV score ≥ 2.0 and < 2.0 were 0.59 years and 1.33 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that an iBMV score ≥ 2.0, ECOG performance status score of 1-3, Stage IV, and non-adenocarcinoma histology were independent poor prognostic factors (hazard ratio (HR), 1.94; P = 0.0001; HR, 1.53; P = 0.04; HR, 1.45; P = 0.04; and HR, 1.14; P = 0.03, respectively). Patients with iBMV scores of < 2.0 were more likely to undergo craniotomy or stereotactic irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: An iBMV score ≥ 2.0 is an independent predictor of survival in NSCLC patients with metachronous BM, regardless of the treatment modality.

Incidence and Treatment Outcome of Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients With Limited-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Concurrent Accelerated Hyperfractionated Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy.

Purpose: This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of and evaluate the risk factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP) induced by chemoradiation therapy (CRT) using accelerated hyperfractionated (AHF) radiation therapy (RT) in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Methods and Materials: Between September 2002 and February 2018, 125 patients with LS-SCLC were treated with early concurrent CRT using AHF-RT. Chemotherapy was comprised of carboplatin/cisplatin with etoposide. RT was administered twice daily (45 Gy/30 fractions). We collected data regarding onset and treatment outcomes for RP, and analyzed the relationship between RP and total lung dose-volume histogram findings. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to assess patient- and treatment-related factors for grade ≥2 RP. Results: The median age of patients was 65 years, and 73.6% of participants were men. In addition, 20% and 80.0% of participants presented with disease stage II and III, respectively. The median follow-up time was 73.1 months. Grades 1, 2, and 3 RP were observed in 69, 17, and 12 patients, respectively. Grades 4 to 5 RP were not observed. RP was treated with corticosteroids in patients with grade ≥2 RP, without recurrence. The median time from initiation of RT to onset of RP was 147 days. Three patients developed RP within 59 days, 6 within 60 to 89 days, 16 within 90 to 119 days, 29 within 120 to 149 days, 24 within 150 to 179 days, and 20 within ≥180 days. Among the dose-volume histogram parameters, the percentage of lung volume receiving >30 Gy (V30) was most strongly related to the incidence of grade ≥2 RP, and the optimal threshold to predict RP incidence was V30 ≥20%. On multivariate analysis, V30 ≥20% was an independent risk factor for grade ≥2 RP. Conclusions: The incidence of grade ≥2 RP correlated strongly with a V30 of ≥20%. Contrarily, the onset of RP induced by concurrent CRT using AHF-RT may occur later. RP is manageable in patients with LS-SCLC.

Efficacy and safety of carboplatin and etoposide in older extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients with a poor performance status.

Carboplatin plus etoposide is a standard treatment for older extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients with performance status (PS) 2. However, older patients often exhibit poor PS (3, 4), and the treatment effect in them is poorly understood. To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus etoposide therapy for this population, we retrospectively analyzed 63 patients with ES-SCLC with PS ≥2, aged ≥71 years, who had received first-line carboplatin plus etoposide therapy. We compared the treatment efficacy and safety in patients with baseline PS 2 versus those with PS 3-4. In the PS 2 (38 patients) and PS ≥3 (25 patients) groups, the overall response rate was 71.1% and 72.0%, median progression-free survival was 4.6 and 3.1 months, and overall survival was 7.7 and 5.1 months, respectively. PS improved to 0-1 post-treatment in 65.8% and 48.0% of the patients in the PS 2 and PS ≥3 groups, respectively. Patients with PS ≥3 showing improved PS had a progression-free survival of 6.1 months. A higher incidence of grade ≥3 decreased neutrophil counts, febrile neutropenia, and treatment-related death was observed in the PS ≥3 group. The progression-free survival of patients administered prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was 5.2 and 6.1 months in the PS2 and PS ≥3 groups. Overall, carboplatin plus etoposide therapy provided comparable tumor shrinkage, but shorter progression-free and overall survival in older ES-SCLC patients with PS ≥3 than in those with PS 2. Thus, supportive care, such as prophylactic G-CSF administration, may be necessary to ensure safety and survival.

Efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with cancer cachexia: Post-hoc subgroup analyses of a placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Cachexia, a disorder associated with anorexia, inflammation, and muscle wasting, is frequent in cancer patients. We performed post-hoc analyses of the ONO-7643-04 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in subgroups of Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The patients were divided into subgroups by baseline characteristics, including sex, age, body mass index, prior weight loss, performance status (PS), concomitant anticancer therapy, and number of previous chemotherapy regimens. The changes from baseline through to 12 weeks for lean body mass (LBM), body weight, and appetite were calculated. Appetite was evaluated using the quality of life questionnaire for cancer patients treated with anticancer drugs (QOL-ACD) item 8 score. Responder rates were defined as the maintenance/improvement of LBM (≥0 kg), body weight (≥0 kg), or QOL-ACD item 8 score (≥0) from baseline to all evaluation time points. Safety was evaluated in patients subgrouped by age and PS. RESULTS: Anamorelin resulted in greater improvements versus placebo in LBM, body weight, and appetite in most subgroups. Anamorelin was also associated with greater LBM, body weight, and appetite responder rates than placebo in nearly all subgroups. Among anamorelin-treated patients, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) tended to be more frequent with increasing age (<65 years, 19.2%; ≥65 to <75 years, 45.9%; ≥75 years, 60.0%) and PS score (PS 0-1, 38.4%; PS 2, 60.0%). The frequency of serious ADRs was 2.7% and 0% in the PS 0-1 and PS 2 subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study of NSCLC patients with cancer cachexia revealed consistent improvements in LBM, body weight, and appetite across most subgroups of anamorelin-treated patients. This study also demonstrated the tolerability of anamorelin regardless of age and PS, with a low incidence of serious ADRs in each subgroup.

Clinical impact of tumour burden on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy (ICI + Chemo) is the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of tumour burden on the efficacy of ICI + Chemo remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 92 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI + Chemo. Tumour burden was assessed as the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesion (BSLD) and number of metastatic lesions (BNMLs). We categorised the patients into three groups based on the combined BSLD and BNML values. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (74%) had progressive disease or died. Forty-four patients (48%) in the low-BSLD group had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.5 months, whereas patients in the high-BSLD group had a median PFS of 4.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, p = 0012). Twenty-five patients (27%) in the low-BNML group had a median PFS of 9.6 months, whereas patients in the high-BNML group had a median PFS of 6.5 months (HR = 0.51, p = 0.029). Low-BSLD and low-BNML were associated independently with improved PFS in multivariate analysis. Analysis of the tumour burden combined with BSLD and BNML revealed a trend towards improved PFS as the tumour burden decreased, with median PFS of 22.3, 8.7, and 3.9 months in the low- (N = 13), medium- (N = 42) and high-burden (N = 37) groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that a high tumour burden negatively impacts the efficacy of ICI + Chemo in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Report of two patients in whom comparisons of the somatic mutation profile were useful for the diagnosis of metastatic tumors.

BACKGROUND: When a patient has multiple tumors in different organs, it is very important to identify whether the tumors are multiple cancers or metastasis from one tumor in order to establish an optimal treatment strategy. However, it is difficult to obtain an accurate diagnosis from conventional diagnostic strategies, including immunohistochemistry. We report two patients with multiple tumors in which a somatic mutation comparison using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was useful for the diagnosis of a metastatic tumor. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Patient 1: A 64-year-old man was diagnosed with gastric and lung cancer. After radical chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer, gastrectomy was planned for gastric cancer. At gastrectomy, the patient underwent a multiple omics analysis for "Project HOPE". The gene mutational signature of the gastric tumor showed signature 4 of COSMIC mutational signature version 2, which was associated with smoking and has not been found in gastric cancer. To confirm that the gastric tumor was metastasis from lung cancer, we conducted a somatic mutation comparison of the two tumors with 409-gene panel sequencing, which revealed that 28 of 97 mutations in the lung tumor completely matched those of the gastric tumor. Based on these findings, the gastric tumor was diagnosed as metastasis from lung cancer. Patient 2: A 47-year-old woman underwent distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A colon tumor was detected 6 years after gastrectomy. The colon lesion was a submucosal tumor-like elevated tumor, and was suspected to be metastasis from gastric cancer. The patient underwent sigmoidectomy, and participated in "Project HOPE". The possibility of primary colon cancer could not be ruled out, and we conducted a somatic mutation comparison of the two tumors as we did with Patient 1. Panel sequencing revealed 11 mutations in the gastric tumors, 4 of which completely matched those of the colon tumor. The colon tumor was diagnosed as metastasis from gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: We reported two patients with multiple tumors in which a somatic mutation comparison using NGS was useful for the diagnosis of a metastatic tumor.